<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: ADB Goes 0.1.1</title>
	<link>http://blogs.newphoria.de/2008/12/01/adb-goes-011/</link>
	<description>Newphoria Project News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 20:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Von: ekkehard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.newphoria.de/2008/12/01/adb-goes-011/#comment-14</link>
		<author>ekkehard</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.newphoria.de/2008/12/01/adb-goes-011/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Note however, that speed is currently not the primary goal of the library, the primary goal is ease of use and a powerful API. While ADB does have some concepts aimed at improving performance, they have not been tested yet with huge amounts of data. You might be pleased to hear that tables can be of arbitrary size (within the confines of the underlying file system, currently).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note however, that speed is currently not the primary goal of the library, the primary goal is ease of use and a powerful API. While ADB does have some concepts aimed at improving performance, they have not been tested yet with huge amounts of data. You might be pleased to hear that tables can be of arbitrary size (within the confines of the underlying file system, currently).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: ekkehard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.newphoria.de/2008/12/01/adb-goes-011/#comment-13</link>
		<author>ekkehard</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.newphoria.de/2008/12/01/adb-goes-011/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Support for read-only databases is complete now, but tables are kind of a slow birth. The solution has almost constant insertion time, no matter how big the tables grow. Looks like views will just be special cases of tables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Support for read-only databases is complete now, but tables are kind of a slow birth. The solution has almost constant insertion time, no matter how big the tables grow. Looks like views will just be special cases of tables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: ekkehard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.newphoria.de/2008/12/01/adb-goes-011/#comment-12</link>
		<author>ekkehard</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.newphoria.de/2008/12/01/adb-goes-011/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>BTW, one of the unresolved issues is the access of read-only databases. Right now, this will not work, but I will provide support in the code in a later version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, one of the unresolved issues is the access of read-only databases. Right now, this will not work, but I will provide support in the code in a later version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: ekkehard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.newphoria.de/2008/12/01/adb-goes-011/#comment-11</link>
		<author>ekkehard</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.newphoria.de/2008/12/01/adb-goes-011/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Coming up next are tables and views, BTW. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming up next are tables and views, BTW. <img src='http://blogs.newphoria.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

